Visible and Physical as Unspeakable (Fedorov – Tolstoy – Shestov – Rozanov – Shklovsky)
Publication Title:
Visible and Physical as Unspeakable (Fedorov – Tolstoy – Shestov – Rozanov – Shklovsky)
Abstract:
At the turn of the 19th–20th century and in the first third of the 20th century literary conventions changed, the poetic word reached the limits of the expressible. The article argues that aesthetic thought in this period is developing largely under the influence of L.N. Tolstoy’s late period of work, when he radically revised his view of the unity and monolithic nature of narrative, testing a new mode of writing. On the other hand, it is shown that the views of N.F. Fedorov and L.N. Tolstoy’s role of scientific knowledge largely determines the worldview during this period. The article proves the position that the limits of the expressible in art also correspond to the desire of the creator to image his personal presence in the work as evidence of its truth. In particular, it was revealed that N.F. Fedorov sees in a close reading of a book and studying system of views of its author the source of his bodily resurrection. L.N. Tolstoy expressed the search of truth “for himself” as religious feeling. The article shows that the visible and physical verify to the truth of absolute unity in the philosophy of V.S. Solovyov. Author’s personal presence in his work (literally “author’s face”, according to L. Shestov) is a way to resist the “lie” (according to A.A. Potebnya) of expressed and published thoughts. The lie also examined by V.V. Rozanov. He contrasted “literature” and “handwriting of the soul” as the work “for self”. The conclusion emphasizes similarity of views on the nature of art from Tolstoy and Fedorov through Shestov and Rozanov to Shklovsky.
References:
(Sources)
Collected Works
1. Fedorov, N.F. Tvorenie i vossozdavanie [Creation and Recreation], in Fedorov, N.F. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t., t. 2 [Collected Works in 4 vols., vol. 2]. Moscow: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», 1995, p. 77.
2. Fedorov, N.F. Dopolnenie k stat'e «Muzey» [Addition to the article “Museum”], in Fedorov, N.F. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t., t. 2 [Collected Works in 4 vols., vol. 2]. Moscow: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress», 1995, pp. 430–437.
3. Pushkin, A.S. V odnoy iz Shekspirovykh komediy [In one of Shakespeare's comedies], in Pushkin, A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 10 t., t. 7 [Collected Works in 10 vols., vol. 7]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1958, p. 514.
4. Shestov, L. Potestas Clavium, in Shestov, L. Sochineniya: v 2 t., t. 1 [Collected Works in 2 vols., vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka, 1993, pp. 17–312.
5. Shestov, L. Pokhvala Gluposti [The Praise of Folly], in Shestov, L. Sochineniya: v 2 t., t. 2 [Collected Works in 2 vols., vol. 2]. Tomsk: Vodoley, 1996, pp. 225–238.
6. Solov'ev, V.S. Poeziya F.I. Tyutcheva [F.I. Tyutchev’s Poetry], in Solov'ev, V.S. Filosofiya iskusstva i literaturnaya kritika [Philosophy of Art and Literary Criticism]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1991, pp. 465–483.
7. Tolstoy, L.N. Chto takoe iskusstvo? [What is Art?], in Tolstoy, L.N. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 90 t., t. 30. Proizvedeniya 1882–1898 [Collected Works in 90 vols., vol. 30]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1951, pp. 27–203.
8. Tolstoy, L.N. Dnevnik 1909 [Diary 1909], in Tolstoy, L.N. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 90 t., t. 57. Dnevniki i zapisnye knizhki 1909 g. [Collected Works in 90 vols., vol. 57. Diaries and notebooks of 1909]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1952, pp. 3–196.
9. Tolstoy, L.N. Dnevnik 1897 [Diary 1897], in Tolstoy, L.N. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 90 t., t. 53. Dnevniki i zapisnye knizhki 1895–1899 [Collected Works in 90 vols., vol. 53]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1953, pp. 129–174.
Individual Works
10. Ben'yamin, W. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti [The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction], in Ben'yamin, W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of similarity. Media aesthetic works]. Moscow: RGGU, 2012, pp. 190–231.
11. Lévinas, E. Total'nost' i beskonechnoe [Totality and the Infinite], in Lévinas, E. Izbrannoe: Total'nost' i beskonechnoe [Works: Totality and the Infinite]. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000, pp. 66–288.
12. Potebnya, A.A. Psikhologiya poeticheskogo i prozaicheskogo myshleniya [Psychology of poetic and prosaic thinking], in Potebnya, A.A. Slovo i mif [Word and myth]. Moscow: Pravda, 1989, pp. 201–235.
13. Rozanov, V.V. Opavshie list'ya [Fallen leaves], in Rozanov, V.V. O sebe i zhizni svoey. Uedinennoe. Smertnoe. Opavshie list'ya. Apokalipsis nashego vremeni [About yourself and your life. Secluded. Mortal. Fallen leaves. Apocalypse of our time]. Moscow: Moskovskiy rabochiy, 1990, pp. 165–576.
14. Shestov, L. N.F. Fedorov, in N.F. Fedorov: pro et contra. In 2 books, book 1. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 2004, pp. 714–716.
15. Shklovskiy, V. Prodolzhayu [I continue], in Shklovskiy, V. Tret'ya fabrika [Third factory]. Moscow: Artel' pisateley – “KRUG”, 1926, pp. 7–9.
(Articles from Scientific Journals)
16. Gacheva, A.G. V.Ya. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov i deyateli Fedoroviany 1900–1920-kh godov: vopros o smysle i tselyakh iskusstva. Stat'ya pervaya: O chem sporili Bryusov i Fedorov v dome Yu.P. Barteneva [V.Y. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov and the Fedorovians of the 1900s-1920s: The Question of Meaning and Goals of Art Article one: What were Bryusov and Fedorov Arguing about in the House of Yu.P. Bartenev], in Solov'evskie issledovaniya, 2023, issue 4(80), pp. 113–131.
17. Ginzburg, K. Ostranenie: Predystoriya odnogo literaturnogo priema [Ostranenie: The Background of a Literary Device], in Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006, no. 4(80), pp. 9–29.
18. Levchenko, Ya. Poslevkusie formalizma. Proliferatsiya teorii v tekstakh Viktora Shklovskogo 1930-kh godov [Aftertaste of formalism. Proliferation of theory in the texts of Viktor Shklovsky in the 1930s], in Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014, no. 4, pp. 125–143.
19. Matveeva, I.Yu., Evlampiev, I.I. Religioznoe uchenie L. Tolstogo i kontseptsiya lichnosti L. Karsavina [Religious doctrine of L. Tolstoy and L. Karsavin's concept of a personality], in Solov'evskie issledovaniya, 2019, issue 3(63), pp. 150–161.
(Articles from Proceedings and Collections of Research Papers)
20. Eykhenbaum, B.M. Kak sdelana «Shinel'» Gogolya [How Gogol's “Overcoat” was made], in Poetika. Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo yazyka [Poetry. Collections on the theory of poetic language]. Pg.: 18-ya Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1919, pp. 151–165.
21. Shklovskiy, V. Iskusstvo kak priem [Art as a technique], in Poetika. Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo yazyka [Poetry. Collections on the theory of poetic language]. Saint-Petersburg: 18-ya Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1919, pp. 101–114.
(Monographs)
22. Kaufman, Andrew D. Understanding Tolstoy. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011, xiii, 322 p.
23. Obolevitch, Teresa. Faith and Science in Russian Religious Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 220 p.
24. Orwin, Donna Tussing. Tolstoy’s Art and Thought, 1847–1880. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993. 269 p.
25. Smirnova N.N. Fragment i nezavershaemoe proizvedenie: zamysel, chtenie [Fragment and unfinishable work: concept, reading]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”, 2023. 288 p.
26. Weir, Justin. Leo Tolstoy and the Alibi of Narrative. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011. 294 p.
Key words:
influence of N.F. Fedorov’s thought in 20th century, L. Tolstoy’s works at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, visible and physical in the philosophy of V.S. Solovyov, fragmentary and aphoristic writing of L. Shestov and V.V. Rozanov, V. Shklovsky and Russian Formalists, ‘expressible’ in Russian philosophy of art and literary theory of the first third of the 20th century
The DOI index:
10.17588/2076-9210.2024.2.035-044
Publication file:
