V.S. Solovyov and Modern Problems of Historiography and Source Study of Russian Philosophy
Publication Title:
V.S. Solovyov and Modern Problems of Historiography and Source Study of Russian Philosophy
Abstract:
The article presents answers to the following questions formulated by the editorial board of the journal “Solovyov Studies”: How do you assess the current state of research in this field and, in particular, the heritage of V.S. Solovyov? Is there obvious success in publishing the heritage of Russian philosophers and rather sufficient activity of relevant studies? What are the failures and what, in your opinion, are the reasons for them? In recent years in the community of researchers of the history of Russian philosophy one can hear the opinion that the philosophical heritage of V.S. Solovyov is irrelevant. In your opinion, has Solovyov lost his relevance? What aspects of his philosophical, literary and journalistic legacy have not yet been sufficiently developed, are there prospects for the development of the philosophy of unitotality, or does it belong entirely to history? The significance of V.S. Solovyov's legacy as the first, most developed philosophical system and the relevance of his teachings as the most successful example of philosophical thought in Russian are considered. The contribution of V.S. Solovyov to the development of philosophical terminology in Russia is pointed out. A brief outline of the historiography of Russian philosophy is given. It is noted that there is not a large number of critical editions of the sources of Russian philosophy, that the research of the history of Russian philosophy is not a priority in national science and educational policy, that there is not enough historiographical reflection. Modern researchers of Russian philosophy have not formulated fundamentally new approaches and belong to the same historiographical paradigm as the authors of the early 20th century. The situation can be changed by creating a new historical and philosophical narrative.
References:
(Sources)
Collected Works
1. Sergeev, M. (ed.) Russkoe Zarubezh'e: Antologiya sovremennoy filosofskoy mysli [Russian Abroad: An Anthology of Contemporary Philosophical Thought]. Boston: M-Graphics, 2018. 379 p.
2. Sergeev, M., Chumakov, A., Theis, M. (eds.) Russian Philosophy in the Twentieth-First Century: An Anthology. Leiden & Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2020, xviii. 426 p.
3. Stepanyants, M.T. (ed.) Sravnitel'naya filosofiya: ot sravnitel'noy k mezhkul'turnoy filosofii [Comparative philosophy: from comparative to intercultural philosophy]. Moscow: Nauka; Vostochnaya literatura, 2022. 399 p.
(Articles from Scientific Journals)
4. Antonov, K.M., Vanchugov, V.V., Gerasimov, N.I., Zabelin, K.V., Malinov, A.V., Maslin, M.A., Porus, V.N., Sidorin, V.V., Teslya, A.A., Chervyakov, N.A., Shindyapin, A.V., Shpakovskiy, M.V. Diskussiya «Problemy prepodavaniya istorii russkoy filosofii v vysshey shkole» [Discussion “Problems of Teaching the History of Russian Philosophy in Higher School”], in Otechestvennaya filosofiya, 2023, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 29–73. DOI: 10.21146/2949-3102-2023-1-2-29-73.
5. Kupriyanov, V.A. Spisok trudov Ernesta Leopol'dovicha Radlova (1854–1928) [List of works by Ernest Leopoldovich Radloff (1854–1928)], in Filosofskiy polilog, 2023, no. 2, pp. 91–112. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2023.2.209
6. Kupriyanov, V.A. Problema original'nosti russkoy filosofii v ranney istoriografii russkoy filosofii [The problem of originality of Russian philosophy in the early historiography of Russian philosophy], in Filosofskiy polilog, 2022, no. 2, pp. 27–46. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2022.2.176
7. Mezhuev, B.V. «On videl osobuyu missiyu russkogo naroda». Pochemu filosof Vladimir Solov'ev schital, chto Rossiya ob"edinit vse chelovechestvo? [“He saw a special mission of the Russian people”. Why did philosopher Vladimir Solovyov believe that Russia would unite all of humanity?], in Solov'evskie issledovaniya, 2024, issue 1(81), pp. 7–19. DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2024.1.007-019.
8. Nazarova, O.A. K analizu tridtsatiletney istorii issledovaniya filosofii S.L. Franka v postsovetskom kul'turnom prostranstve [Towards an analysis of the thirty-year history of the study of S.L. Frank's philosophy in the post-Soviet cultural space], in Filosofskiy polilog, 2022, no. 1, pp. 101–128. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2022.1.168
9. Zinov'eva, A.P., Kupriyanov, V.A. Nauchnoe i filosofskoe nasledie E.L. Radlova v kontekste razvitiya russkoy filosofii kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka [Scientific and philosophical heritage of E.L. Radlov in the context of the development of Russian philosophy of the late XIX – early XX century], in Filosofskiy polilog, 2023, no. 2, pp. 71–90. https://doi.org/10.31119/phlog.2023.2.208
Key words:
history of Russian philosophy, source study, historiography of Russian philosophy, historical and philosophical narrative, language of philosophy, philosophical school
The DOI index:
10.17588/2076-9210.2024.3.012-022
Publication file:
